Tim_K
Dec 11, 2011 at 04:27:15 PM
I've got the feeling there are some harsh critics in here. Seaworm did an enormously creative interpretation of elzaban's underrated starting sentence. Let's see you draw an interpretation of that sentence.
The best way to see if a drawing does what it should, is by simply imagining that the drawing came first and the description where the drawing was based on would be a description. If it fits, well you've got yourself a 5 worthy drawing, especially with a creative approach like this one.
Same with uzworm, who was able to make up George Washington from binbon's simple, yet effective way of presenting him.
And after typing all that, I can't help but feel like a whining sixty year old fart.
In any case this was a cool game! :)
*M* elzaban
Dec 12, 2011 at 01:54:53 AM
Seaworm's interpretation was lovely, but I think people might have voted him down for using words in his submission. Some folks are pretty opinionated about that. And maybe people who spend the whole hour on their drawing might not care for binbon's simplicity. But at the end of the day, a rating is really supposed to be a reflection about how people feel about something, regardless of why they feel that way.
Love the Game?
Become a Member!
or
Make a Donation