< TSG Game Viewer ---- Game 6031 ---- Rated: 3.1 >

I thought he was wearing a tiara, but it was just his sunglasses reflecting the light.

*M* tymaporer
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 01:47:55 PM

4.5

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

I want to die.
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 07:40:58 PM

2.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

Sunglasses aren't the king of Iwanttodie's bleak existence.

Flux Capacitor
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 10:23:54 PM

5.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

Kafeithekeaton
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 10:54:42 PM

5.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

Nice try Issac William T. Dwight, but those fancy shades aren't going to save you from the burning flames of HELL.

exp_jeans
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 11:03:27 PM

5.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

killjews
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 11:06:17 PM

1.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

"If you're not sure, check past submissions of the possible spammer." That's not really helping, considering this is his first entry...

Chwoka
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 11:14:50 PM

3.5

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

Ragnell
submitted: Aug 5, 2007 at 11:42:31 PM

3.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

Unlike TSG, EatPoopUCat.com actually gets rid of trolls! (Don't take my word for it, ask groomble, kafeithekeaton, or ablind6yearold about their bans.) Why am I STILL able to troll TSG? What's your excuse, Eric Montellazy?

WE STILL RAPE U
submitted: Aug 6, 2007 at 02:47:40 AM

1.0

rate it! 1 (Lame) 2 3 4 5 (Wow!)

14 Responses:

Kafeithekeaton
Aug 6, 2007 at 02:52:41 AM

I have never been banned from Eat Poop U Cat. I have never played a game at Eat Poop U Cat. I will never play a game at Eat Poop U Cat. What you have said is a lie and you have no evidence to prove your accusation.

destinknee
Aug 6, 2007 at 03:31:29 AM

My answer to that is, us TSGers love honesty, fair play and expect respect, for we respect others. Therefore, we dont expect there to be fuckers around. It's like war, those countries that feel they're worthless do everything to defend themselves, while others that feel others aren't gonna bomb them waste less money on shields.
does that make sense?

destinknee
Aug 6, 2007 at 03:34:12 AM

then the worthless countries feel even worse about themselves, so they invent reasons to bomb other innocent countries.
we are all victims here people. including the enemy, as they don't know any better.

Scissors King
Aug 6, 2007 at 05:13:01 AM

I marked that picture of hitler as spam, then I marked one from Iarejake as spam, then I got one from WE still rape TSG which I couldn't mark because of the damned mark as spam rule.

Chwoka
Aug 6, 2007 at 07:46:24 AM

I got that Hitler picture. Didn't mark as spam, even if the username was "Killjews". I saw three Hitler pictures (obviously spam) after that, but I couldn't mark one...

Evang-y1203
Aug 6, 2007 at 10:45:31 AM

I still don't understand the logic behind limiting how much spam can be marked, but...I'd say it's better to let a game go than to fill out a spam game.

Chwoka
Aug 6, 2007 at 10:51:39 AM

Well, MAYBE there are trolls out there who would delete anything and everything coming at them, deleting eventually, everything. With no ability to get those sentences and pictures back. Maybe trolls are already doing it, but they're not doing TOO much damage because they can only delete 2 games at a time.

Kafeithekeaton
Aug 6, 2007 at 01:32:01 PM

If you can't mark it as spam, make duplicate accounts and get to work. That's what I did.

*M* Abraxas
Aug 6, 2007 at 02:01:22 PM

chwoka - that's exactly the reason (except that nothing is deleted unless approved by a moderator) -- but there's new additions in the works to help this problem. Trusted users will be able to mark continually as spam.

B0BBarker
Aug 6, 2007 at 05:26:11 PM

If Kafei was completely banned from EPUC, then how was he able to register an account there to clear up his name and say that he didn't do anything?